Six publicly documented apartment sales in Santa Monica, Sherman Oaks, and Encino show how much property-level results can vary. Each record below links to the reported transaction and the local property page.

Selected transactions involving Jason Matatiaho, with reported closing dates from June 7, 2024–July 8, 2026. This is a small, non-random sample spanning multiple years. It is not a quarterly market survey, a complete sales count, or evidence of a price trend.

What this sample contains

The 6 transactions represent 90 units and $20,075,000 in reported consideration. The median of the six individual sale-price-per-unit calculations is $217,735. Source: the six linked records below; calculations by Jason Matatiaho. Sample size for each overall figure: six sales.

Reported closings · June 7, 2024–July 8, 2026 · n = 6
Property / geographyClosing datePriceUnitsPrice / unitSource
4919 Coldwater Canyon Ave
Sherman Oaks
$2,700,00013$207,692Traded
4544 Colbath Ave
Sherman Oaks
$3,200,00010$320,000Traded
5233 Tilden Ave
Sherman Oaks
$2,100,00014$150,000Traded
17340 Burbank Blvd
Encino
$6,150,00027$227,778Traded
13950-13960 Burbank Blvd
Sherman Oaks
$3,275,00016$204,688Traded
1224 9th St
Santa Monica
$2,650,00010$265,000Homes.com sale history (The MLS)

Geography and building-size segments

These groups describe the same six-sale sample over June 7, 2024–July 8, 2026. Geography follows the source’s market label: Santa Monica is a separate city; Sherman Oaks and Encino are Los Angeles neighborhoods. Size means apartment unit count, not building square footage. Geographic and size groups overlap and must not be added together.

Selected sample by market and unit count
SegmentSales (n)Median price / unit
Santa Monica1$265,000 (single sale)
Sherman Oaks4$206,190
Encino1$227,778 (single sale)
5–9 units0No observations
10–19 units5$207,692
20+ units1$227,778 (single sale)

How to use the differences

In this sample, the Sherman Oaks sales differ in price per unit even within one neighborhood. They occurred at different dates and involve different buildings. Those differences cannot isolate market appreciation or identify the effect of any single property feature.

Before using one as a comparable, reconcile unit mix, in-place income, lease terms, physical condition, and the date of sale. The Santa Monica observation is one 10-unit property; it cannot establish a citywide pricing benchmark. The Encino observation is one 27-unit property, so it is also insufficient to describe a typical larger-building sale.

Sources, scope, and calculations

  • Selection: six closed multifamily properties on this site with public reporting of closing date, price, and unit count that was checked for this edition. Active, pending, hidden, and non-multifamily listings are excluded.
  • Sources: five Traded transaction records and the Homes.com sale history sourced to The MLS for 1224 9th Street. These are published reports, not independently audited closing statements.
  • Each property appears once. The two-building Burbank Boulevard sale and the Coldwater Canyon address pair are each counted as one reported transaction.
  • Price per unit = reported price ÷ reported units. Medians use the unrounded per-sale results; displayed amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar. The overall median is not total dollars divided by total units.
  • Missing values: zero among the six included dates, prices, and unit counts. Other properties without the required verified fields are outside this selected sample; absence here does not mean a sale did not occur.
  • Square-footage statistics and cap-rate comparisons are omitted. Some source-page area figures conflict internally, and consistent income definitions are unavailable.
  • Selection and reporting bias, small sample sizes, and mixed dates limit any inference. A quarterly market report would require a consistently defined, broader sales dataset.

Continue the property-specific analysis

Request a property pricing review